The memory of events in matter... - La memoria degli eventi nella materia...

That there is an indisputable connection between energy emission and matter is a fact known to anyone, even before the discoveries of quantum physics. Suffice it to see the action of solar energy and its uptake useful for life processes on Earth ...

Energy and matter are closely interconnected and at a certain level indistinguishable from each other. And at the basis of their appearance in specific forms and ways there is the constant and continuous mutation, a sort of ups and downs that between one and the other polarity that allows the existence of the known universe.

According to I Ching, or Book Of Changes, creation occurs constantly through the meeting of Heaven and Earth, or Energy and Matter, Consciousness and Form, but this description is not only the prerogative of the I Ching, also other religions and philosophies (and even modern science) indicate movement, vibration or transformation as the prime factor that creates the world. The kinetic energy released through the change in the original static "quid" has propagated in an apparently infinite development that uses the conducting channels of space and time. Whether you call it Word, Om, Spirit or Tao is of little importance ...

From the point of view of empirical experience, based on observation in a space-time continuum and also according to the theory of the gradual creation of the universe, we imagine a "beginning" called Big Bang (the big bang) or "Creative Act" in which the static energy concentration reaches a critical phase of irrepressibility and a collapse follows (corresponding to the beginning of space time) which coincides with the manifestation projection in which energy takes shape, gradually, becoming matter. The gradualness and continuity of creation is measured through an "aspect" that always accompanies, we could even say records, the creative process. This aspect is immanent and transcendent and is the "consciousness", which is an integral part, a sort of intrinsic flavor or quality, of the energetic development in progress.

We can therefore safely say that "consciousness, energy and matter" are the same thing, as the time and space that appear and coexist complementarily. Without the duration in time and the expansion in space nothing could manifest itself and without consciousness and energy no form or entity would have meaning or existence. For this reason it is impossible to separate the manifestation from the awareness that sanctions it.

Each element, being the transformation into the infinite possibility of energy movements in space and time, retains a specific memory (or intelligence) which is necessary for the cohesion of its substance (or state of energy mutation if we want to use metaphysical terminology). This process of psychosomatization of the existing is simultaneously imprinted in a sort of "negative" that corresponds to the formula with respect to the experimental procedure in progress (we can also define it as "memory", "shadow" or "antithesis"). But it is not only a negative description, it is also a substratum, it is a constituent force that allows the manifest whole to maintain a shape and a name, in short, it makes it assume a specific identity.

And it is for this reason that specific archetypal forms, trigrams and hexagrams, are identified in the I Ching, useful for recognizing the energy aggregations in progress. In short, we can say that events repeat themselves, albeit in an evolutionary scale, in a sort of continuous gradient but attributable to an already known process. Hence also the concept of “psycho-history”, which is nothing other than the design memory constituting the phenomena, which remains imprinted in the results of active phenomenology: the vital processes. Therefore history is not that written in books, that of books is only a deceptive, partial and subjective documentation that describes the aspects perceived by some witnesses, or listeners of witnesses.

History as we know it is a shaky pseudo-truth, an almost imaginary description, told and corroborated (for speculative purposes) by the opinion of its editors. What we call history is at best the description of a realistic imaginative shared (more or less) by many (however a limited number of people).


But the truth cannot be partial, just as the integrity of our bodily existence cannot be broken up. In the sense that we cannot say “this organ or this appendix does not belong to me or is useless, the hair, nails and hair are not important because they grow and are eliminated without excessive damage…” or similar jokes. In fact, even if we almost always use the right hand for our actions we also need the left, if we become bald we consider it a defect, if the nails break even the fingers suffer from it, etc. In short, historical truth should correspond to a wholeness and this wholeness is given only by that subtle memory that remains imprinted in the constantly changing phenomenal forms.

This "memory", which at a vital level is defined as DNA, at a psychic level I call it "psychohistory", that is, the ability to read the automatic storage, the non-perceptible accounting record, present in all the events. And there is no separation whatsoever in any vital process, which manifests itself with our direct involvement or with an indirect one, in short, every element, physical or psychic, is influenced by the ongoing mutation. This logically also happens for the events on the face of the planet: an atomic bomb in Siberia affects the environmental conditions of Antarctica ...

So if we want to know the story, the real one, it is necessary to enter the storehouse of the vital mnemonic function, which is still present in a holographic key in each of us. In India this warehouse is called Akasha, Jung called it Collective Unconscious, esotericists call it Aura of the Earth.

How to draw on this mysterious and ever-present archive?
The answer lies in the question itself ... How does water know water? How does fire know fire? How do you know yourself?

Being it…! Only by being it ... Not as an observer who looks, but as a constituent substance of the current energy trend. Thus stripping ourselves of the separation that prevents us from perceiving the whole of which we are an integral part. In fact, those who are gifted with foresight or mediumship can perceive this total "memory" of the great magma of existence only by melting into that "consciousness". That is, renouncing the small separative identity of the ego that leads us to identify ourselves with the single molecule of the life process and to describe the existing within the narrow scope of the perceptible, limited to the circumscribed presence. This is often what happens not only in our minds but also in its by-products: official history, philosophy or religion and science.

Paolo D’Arpini

Testo Italiano:

Che ci sia un’attinenza indiscutibile fra l’emissione energetica e la materia è un fatto conosciuto da chiunque, prima ancora delle scoperte della fisica quantica. Basti vedere l’azione dell’energia solare e della sua captazione utile ai processi vitali sulla Terra…

Energia e materia sono strettamente interconnesse ed a un certo livello indistinguibili l’una dall’altra. Ed alla base del loro apparire in specifiche forme e modi c’è la mutazione costante e continua, una sorta di saliscendi che fra l’una e l’altra polarità che consente l’esistenza dell’universo conosciuto.

Secondo I Ching, o Libro Dei Mutamenti, la creazione avviene costantemente attraverso l’incontro di Cielo e Terra, ovvero Energia e Materia, Coscienza e Forma, ma questa descrizione non è sola prerogativa dell’I Ching, anche altre religioni e filosofie (ed anche la moderna scienza) indicano il movimento, la vibrazione o trasformazione, come fattore primo che crea il mondo. L’energia cinetica sprigionata attraverso il cambiamento sopraggiunto nel “quid” originario statico si è propagata in uno svolgimento, apparentemente infinito, che utilizza i canali conduttori dello spazio e del tempo. Che lo si chiami Verbo, Om, Spirito o Tao ha poca importanza…
Dal punto di vista dell’esperienza empirica, basata sull’osservazione in un continuum spazio temporale ed anche secondo la teoria della creazione graduale dell’universo si immagina un “inizio” chiamato Big Bang (il grande botto) o “Atto Creativo” in cui la concentrazione energetica statica giunge ad una fase critica di incontenibilità e ne consegue un collasso (corrispondente all’inizio dello spazio tempo) che coincide con la proiezione manifestativa in cui l’energia assume forma, gradualmente, divenendo materia. La gradualità e continuità della creazione viene misurata attraverso un “aspetto” che sempre accompagna, potremmo anche dire registra, il processo creativo. Questo aspetto è immanente e trascendente ed è la “coscienza”, la quale è parte integrante, una sorta di sapore o qualità intrinseca, dello svolgimento energetico in corso.

Possiamo quindi tranquillamente affermare che “coscienza, energia e materia” sono la stessa cosa, come il tempo e lo spazio che appaiono e coesistono complementariamente. Senza la durata nel tempo e l’espansione nello spazio nulla potrebbe manifestarsi e senza la coscienza e l’energia nessuna forma od entità avrebbe significato od esistenza. Per questa ragione è impossibile scindere la manifestazione dalla consapevolezza che la sancisce.

Ogni elemento, essendo la trasformazione nell’infinita possibilità dei movimenti energetici nello spazio tempo, conserva una specifica memoria (od intelligenza) che è necessaria alla coesione della sua sostanza (o stato di mutazione energetica se vogliamo usare una terminologia metafisica). Questo procedimento di psicosomatizzazione dell’esistente viene impresso contemporaneamente in una sorta di “negativo” che corrisponde alla formula rispetto al procedimento sperimentale in corso (possiamo definirla anche “memoria”, “ombra” o “antitesi”). Ma non è solo descrizione in negativo è anche substrato, è forza costituente che permette al tutto manifesto di mantenere una forma ed un nome, insomma gli fa assumere una specifica identità.

Ed è per questa ragione che nell’I Ching si individuano delle specifiche forme archetipali, i trigrammi e gli esagrammi, utili al riconoscimento delle aggregazioni energetiche in corso. Insomma possiamo dire che gli eventi si ripetono, pur in in una scala evolutiva, in una sorta di gradiente continuo ma riconducibile ad un processo già conosciuto. Da qui anche il concetto di “psicostoria”, che non è altro che la memoria progettuale costituente i fenomeni, la quale resta impressa nei risultati stessi della fenomenologia attiva: i processi vitali. Perciò la storia non è quella scritta sui libri, quella dei libri è solo una documentazione ingannevole, parziale e soggettiva che descrive gli aspetti percepiti da alcuni testimoni, od ascoltatori dei testimoni.

La storia come noi la conosciamo è una traballante pseudo-verità, una descrizione quasi immaginaria, raccontata e corroborata (a fini speculativi) dall’opinione dei suoi redattori. Quella che chiamiamo storia è al meglio la descrizione di un immaginifico realistico condiviso (più o meno) da molti (comunque un numero limitato di persone).

Ma la verità non può essere parziale, come non può essere sminuzzata l’integrità della nostra esistenza corporea. Nel senso che non possiamo dire “questo organo o questa appendice non mi appartiene od è inutile, i capelli le unghie ed i peli non sono importanti perché crescono e vengono eliminati senza eccessivo danno…” o simili facezie. Infatti anche se usiamo quasi sempre la destra per il nostro agire abbiamo bisogno anche della sinistra, se diventiamo calvi lo consideriamo un difetto, se le unghie si spezzano anche le dita ne soffrono, etc. Insomma la verità storica dovrebbe corrispondere ad un’interezza e questa interezza viene data solo da quella memoria sottile che resta impressa nelle forme in continua mutazione fenomenica.

Questo “ricordo”, che a livello vitale viene definito DNA, a livello psichico io lo chiamo “psicostoria”, ovvero la capacità di lettura della memorizzazione automatica, della registrazione contabile non percettibile, presente nell’insieme degli eventi. E non esiste separazione alcuna in qualsivoglia processo vitale, che si manifesti con il nostro diretto coinvolgimento oppure con uno indiretto, insomma ogni elemento, fisico o psichico, viene influenzato dalla mutazione in corso. Ciò logicamente succede anche per gli eventi sulla faccia del pianeta: una bomba atomica in Siberia influisce sulle condizioni ambientali dell’Antartide...

Per cui se vogliamo conoscere la storia, quella vera, è necessario introdursi nel magazzino della funzione mnemonica vitale, che è presente comunque in chiave olografica in ognuno di noi. In India questo magazzino si chiama Akasha, Jung lo chiamò Inconscio collettivo, gli esoteristi lo chiamano Aura della Terra.
Come fare ad attingere a questo archivio misterioso e sempre presente?

La risposta sta nella domanda stessa… Come fa l’acqua a conoscere l’acqua? Come fa il fuoco a conoscere il fuoco? Come fai a conoscere te stesso?

Essendolo…! Unicamente essendolo… Non come un osservatore che guarda bensì come sostanza costituente dell’andamento energetico in corso. Spogliandosi quindi della separazione che ci impedisce di percepire l’insieme di cui siamo parte integrante. Infatti coloro che sono dotati di preveggenza o medianità possono percepire questa “memoria” totale del grande magma dell’esistenza solo sciogliendosi in quella “coscienza”. Ovvero rinunziando alla piccola identità separativa dell’ego che porta ad identificarci con la singola molecola del processo vitale ed a descrivere l’esistente nello stretto ambito del percettibile, limitato alla presenza circoscritta. Il che è spesso quel che avviene non solo nella nostra mente ma anche nei suoi sottoprodotti: la storia ufficiale, la filosofia o religione e la scienza.

Paolo D’Arpini

A clarification on "Natural (or Lay) Spirituality

Religious mask

I wish to clarify the original meaning of “lay spirituality” which has been misinterpreted and has been misused to define spiritual expressions of lay members belonging to any religion…. 

In reality this "lay" term comes from the Greek word “laikos” which means “not belonging to any religious, philosophical or even political model whatsoever”. Therefore, “lay” means “away from any socially structured context”, similar to the Sanskrit term “pariah”. Hence it is unconceivable for members of any religion to express spirituality in a lay manner .

Therefore Lay Spirituality expresses “natural spirituality”, man’s spontaneous search for his origin and for the mysterious meaning of life. This longing is brought about by the acknowledgement of self. The meaning of “layman” is “common man” and the closest term to express the concept of Lay Spirituality is “awe”. To begin with, I would like to clarify that to me the word “spirit” means “synthesis between intelligence and consciousness”. All the more I confirm that I am not under any circumstance a believer. What I declare is based on what I have experienced in my existence and in being conscious of it. I need no confirmation from others and this is true for all of us. 

There is no need to “believe” in order to say “I am”, we already know that without a shadow of doubt. But, to pass judgement on faith or the lack of it we need to use the term “to believe” or “not to believe”. This brings us to the conclusion that “to be” and being simultaneously conscious of this is natural and undoubtedly true. While to support something which is rooted in our thoughts (in mental speculations) can only be considered a process or a way of conceptualizing

I do not want to be difficult but it is obvious that no one will ever say “I believe to exist and I believe I am aware”. To make any other statements (or abstract/concrete thought forms) we always use the term “believe in this or in religion or in … atheism” or any other thing that we are to believe ….. “I am” is such a pure and simple truth. There is therefore no room to explain the possible reasons for this “being” because this process of explanation (or interpretations) is only a speculation, and is therefore questionable. Let the sophists say that consciousness is the result of the divine spark or the random path of the material that turns into life.

“I am” is the only reality that does not need any proof or discussion. It is on this basis that I want to stay fixed. It makes no sense then to argue about “modes “….. or ” hypothesis “. I say this to silence (and to avoid) any confrontation on the reality of the contingent fact that I expressed (and we can all be aware of this when our minds are at ease). This is laity of the spirit.”Lay spirituality” is a simple and trivial “recognition” of the spontaneous state of each one of us …. (consciousness or self-knowledge.).

To recognize the characteristics which are embodied and to recognize the impulses that characterize our personality is certainly useful for us so as not to fool the mind and not to fall into the trap of false identities. Everything describable cannot be part of “us”, but only the functional structure of the body / mind (in which we recognize ourselves). This psycho-physical apparatus is the result of the merge of natural forces (or elements) and psychic qualities (which are expressions of the elements). With the interconnection of these diverse energies the infinite beings … take shape. Although in reality they are not “forces” or “beings” but a single force and a single being who takes on various aspects during its development in space-time.

But here we need to describe the “capacity to separate” (Maya – yin and yang) that produces the illusion of diversity. It is the first concept that is formed in the mind (in fact it is the mind itself) together with the appearance of the thought “I”. Please note this is not the “I”- the Absolute, the Being, or to be aware beyond any identification. It is instead the first conscious reflexion (by the “ I”) in the mind and allows the objectification and the perception of exteriority through our senses. This is how the mechanism of dissociation is applied in which “I am this” and what is observed “is another.” Thus dualism takes on a semblance of reality and is merged to the sequential causality of the transformations that unroll in space / time. The dual training process is easily detected by the attentive intellect (in the sense of paying attention) but this is still considered within the specular reflection of the mind. So from the standpoint of Absolute Knowledge this explanation (or understanding) is futile, perhaps even unnecessary or misleading … (because of the appropriative tendency of the mirror of thought) and here we return to the necessity of knowing one’s mind to avoid being duped by its empirical fantasies, which aim to demonstrate an objective reality.

You may be wondering at this point: “… So why write this? Why read it? “- But the answer is obvious. 

Sometimes before throwing away wastes we feel the need to examine them in every detail, as not to have regrets later … Unfortunately, in years and years of flying low, we have all developed a strong attachment to our dead weights …! A century and a half ago, in 1859, Charles Darwin published his still controversial but revolutionary “Origin of Species”. The controversy is not yet stilled, but what sounds odd – I think – is the opposite virulent opposition to the theory of evolution by so-called “creationists” (or believers) of religious nature. I will explain later the reasons of my astonishment. I must point out that strictly speaking I don’t consider myself a follower of the Darwinian theory in the sense that at the most I see it as an explanation of the demonstration of the so-called empirical reality … or causality.

The assumption of evolution is based on the observation of the process of transformation of matter and life resulting from the alteration or expansion of space / time. In a sense, this theory must always allow for a “beginning” and thus is close to another theory, the gradual creation of the world, however, based on the presence of a creator God of the universe. According to the speculation of the Big Bang, the beginning of the creative moment is set in the explosion of the primordial nucleus of matter, after which the process of manifestations of life slowly begins.

As a matter of fact, the religious appreciate the Big Bang theory as “proof” of the creative will of God but to be consistent with their beliefs they should also accept the evolutionary process of the various forms of life envisioned by Darwin and his successors. Moreover, if Creation were true “ad personam” made by God for each living organism, separate from any other (a fish is a fish, a donkey is a donkey, a man is a man, etc..). 

One might accuse the Most High of being partial, not only for the hierarchy among the various species but also because some forms of life have even disappeared from the face of the earth as if they were “unpopular” or “neglected” by the creator himself, which doesn’t seem like a sign of justice towards all creatures …. “If one, after running around all day gets to the evening, he should be pleased … Well, now I’ve made it, the twilight of my life has become the dawn of my fame” (Schopenhauer, Senilia, p.. 84 of the original manuscript of 1856).

From the standpoint of the Absolute reality (but also in quantum reality) creation can be “progressive” only to become part of time in space. As Einstein also pointed out, this concept (the existence of space-time) is purely figurative, in other words, its events are all constructed and screened by the mind.

Therefore, in view of the Absolute Existence-Consciousness, creation is the outward appearance which occurs simultaneously although the observer may consider it the mere flow of time in space. This idea is really just a reflection in the mind of the perceiver who can perceive it only when he is able to focus it in his conscience. A single picture of the total event, which is still present in its entirety, is illuminated by the individual conscience, seen in the mind and unwound in the context of space and time which is called “the process of becoming.”
Hence we can deduce that Darwin’s description of evolution is “relative” as much as the religious vision of creation. So much for the philosopher Schopenhauer. I imagined a sort of equation to visualise this point. If we take everything as a whole, in which everything is and is manifested, and we define this as 1 (One) whether we add or subtract to it, one always remains. Example: 1 + 1 = 1,  or 1 – 1 = 1 

Moreover, this concept has been expressed very clearly in the Upanishads where it is says: “If you take Everything away from Everything, Everything still remains.”

Paolo D’Arpini

The half  Paolo D'Arpini

Postscript.
According to the different ways society has developed or the historical periods in which human events have occurred, the individual consciousness is in constant movement and evolution. Each transition is similar to the passing of a level of learning, similar to what happens in the DNA spiral. Consciousness, (better call it the mind) moves from simple expressions to more complex ones. A sort-of memory witness of the varied sophisticated processes of life.
P.D’A.

…………..

La traduzione dall’originale italiano del testo è di Ilaria Gaddini 

Lay spirituality and life in the world - Spiritualità laica e vita nel mondo

I  feel that for us, lay spiritualists, life "in the world" is most congenial, also because our research never goes beyond the self ... and the self is present everywhere and at all times ...

The individual  "I" (ego) rises from the reflection of consciousness in the mirror of the mind. An identifying overlay with the observed object. The object is the body-mind that reacts in relation (to contact) with the other external objects.

The moment that, in self-knowledge, the fictitious identity with the agent disappears what remains is the pure awareness of the Self. It is therefore not necessary, for the purpose of realization, that the images - the world and the observer - disappear, it is sufficient that the false identity with the reflected object / subject (ego) disappears. This means that the world can safely continue to manifest itself not being perceived as a separate reality, more or less as a dream could be compared to the dreamer. At this point the Self and its manifestation are seen as the exact same thing while the sense of the separative ego (of the me and the other) is obliterated. After all, dualism is only ignorance of oneself.

The sage observes the actions taking place without there being any propensity or intention or judgment in him. 

Spontaneously everything happens appropriately and consequently to the designated "destiny". Destiny is the answer to the natural interaction (and predisposition) of the various elements involved ... Since everything happens automatically there is no "preference" in the action of the sage. On the contrary, his own action is (apparently) intentional only in the eyes of the "others", since for the sage everything happens by itself. 

Every event experienced simply happens in his presence and he is the silent and detached witness. His action (or state) can be compared to sleepwalking, or awake sleep.

Moreover, the concept of "destiny" and of action also makes sense only in the mind of the observer still identified with the outside, that is, of an ego that identifies itself with the agent and with his actions. But the moment - as already mentioned - that this identification is destroyed every other connected concept disappears.Wisdom consists in remaining immune from illusion after understanding the truth. The fear of action and its consequences (karma) remains only in those who see the slightest difference between themselves and others. 

As long as the idea exists that the body / mind is the self, one can not be an expression of truth. But certainly it is possible for anyone, and in every condition, to know their true nature because it is absolutely true and real, it is the only one for everyone. In fact, the state of pure Being is common to all and is the direct experience of each one. To live one's true nature is meant by self-realization, since the self is present here and now.

The thought of feeling separate is the only obstacle to the realization of the all-pervading and omnipresent Being. And yet from the empirical point of view, identifying with the agent (ego) is an impediment to the proper functioning of the psychosomatic apparatus, in the context of global functioning. Thus the intellectual acceptance of truth is already a liberating form of intentional (rational) propensity to act. What is destined to happen will happen.

It is in the experience of everyone that getting involved in the question is a handicap to find the answer.

Paolo D'Arpini

Testo italiano

Ritengo che per noi spiritualisti laici la vita “nel mondo” sia più congeniale, anche perché la nostra ricerca non esula mai dal sé.. ed il sé è presente ovunque ed in ogni tempo…
*
L’io individuale (ego) sorge dal riflesso della coscienza nello specchio della mente. Una sovrimposizione identificativa con l’oggetto osservato. L’oggetto è il corpo-mente che reagisce in relazione (al contatto) con gli altri oggetti esterni.
*
Il momento che, nell’autoconoscenza, l’identità fittizia con l’agente scompare quel che resta è la pura consapevolezza del Sé. Non è perciò necessario, al fine della realizzazione, che le immagini -il mondo e l’osservatore- scompaiano, è sufficiente che la falsa identità con l’oggetto/soggetto riflesso (ego) scompaia. Ciò significa che il mondo può tranquillamente continuare a manifestarsi non essendo percepito come realtà separata, più o meno come potrebbe esserlo un sogno rispetto al sognatore. A questo punto il Sé e la sua manifestazione sono visti come la stessa identica cosa mentre il senso dell’io separativo (del me e dell’altro) viene obliterato. In fondo il dualismo è soltanto ignoranza di sé.
*
Il saggio osserva le azioni svolgersi senza che vi sia alcuna propensione o intenzione o giudizio in lui. Spontaneamente ogni cosa avviene confacentemente e conseguentemente al “destino” designato. Il destino è la risposta alla naturale interazione (e predisposizione) dei vari elementi coinvolti… Siccome tutto succede automaticamente non vi è alcuna “preferenza” nell’agire del saggio. Anzi il suo stesso agire è (apparentemente) intenzionale solo agli occhi degli “altri”, giacché per il saggio ogni cosa accade di per sé. Ogni evento vissuto accade semplicemente in sua presenza e lui ne è il testimone silenzioso e distaccato. Il suo agire (o stato) può essere paragonato al sonnambulismo, od al sonno da sveglio.
*
Ed inoltre anche il concetto di “destino” e di azione ha un senso unicamente nella mente dell’osservatore ancora identificato con l’esterno, ovvero di un ego che si identifica con l’agente e con le sue azioni. Ma il momento -come già detto- che tale identificazione è distrutta ogni altro concetto collegato scompare.
La saggezza consiste nel rimanere immune dalla illusione dopo aver compresa la verità. La paura dell’agire e delle sue conseguenze (karma) permane solo in chi vede la pur minima differenza fra sé e l’altro. Finché esiste l’idea che il corpo/mente è l’io non si può essere espressione di verità.
*
Ma certamente è possibile per chiunque, ed in ogni condizione, conoscere la propria vera natura poiché essa è assolutamente vera e reale, è l’unicum per ognuno. Infatti lo stato di puro Essere è comune a tutti ed è la diretta esperienza di ciascuno. Vivere la propria vera natura questo si intende per auto-realizzazione, poiché il sé è presente qui ed ora.
*
Il pensiero di sentirsi separati è il solo ostacolo alla realizzazione dell’Essere onnipervadente ed onnipresente. E pure dal punto di vista empirico identificarsi con l’agente (ego) è un impedimento al buon funzionamento dell’apparato psicosomatico, nel contesto del funzionamento globale . Per cui già l’accettazione intellettuale della verità è una forma liberatoria dalla propensione intenzionale (razionale) ad agire. Ciò che è destinato ad accadere accadrà.
*
E’ nell’esperienza di ognuno che arrovellarsi nella domanda è un handicap a trovare la risposta.

Paolo D’Arpini